Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Klapisch: Clock Ticking on Girardi

From Bob Klapisch:
Sooner or later, the Yankee manager will have to answer for his team's lackluster play; they're 0-23 when trailing after the seventh inning. If this were Year 2 of Girardi's administration instead of Year 1, the sweat already would be gathering on his forehead. Lucky for him that the post-Joe Torre era is in its infancy, and that Girardi was hand-picked by Hank Steinbrenner and Brian Cashman. But the landscape figures to change dramatically by 2009 when Girardi's warranty officially expires.

By next year, he'll be expected to be firmer, more authoritative, more in command of his own clubhouse. So far Girardi has been virtually invisible. One Yankee insider says the manager has been intimidated by the might of the team's corporate machine — in other words, Steinbrenner. The source said, "This isn't the way Joe managed [the Marlins]. It's like he's running scared now, trying to please everyone, always trying to say the right thing."
Girardi is going to have to find a way to restore both Kennedy's and Hughes' confidence after Andy Pettitte and Mike Mussina are gone. The manager will have an even bigger problem getting Derek Jeter to loosen his tentacles around shortstop. If the captain refuses to gracefully surrender the position in the next 2-3 years, Girardi's response – or lack of it - could make or break his career in the Bronx. And we'll see how the manager handles the bellicose Steinbrenner. The players will be able to judge for themselves whose side Girardi is really on.

For all of Torre's faults in his final two years in pinstripes, it's nevertheless true that he kept the clubhouse insulated from controversy, including the ones that started in Tampa. You could feel Torre's presence in the room; he didn't even have to say a word.

Girardi has yet to make such an imprint. True, it's still early, and he gets a free pass in 2008. ... But no grace period lasts forever in the Yankee universe. If the Yankees are loitering at .500 midway through 2009, Girardi may not be hearing little voices, but he'll find it impossible to ignore the ticking clock.
A couple things: He needs to be "firmer, more authoritative, more in command of his own clubhouse" now, and not wait till next year to do it. I also don't think he's done a very good job, the only major impact he's made, from what I can see, is removing candy bars from the locker room.

Besides that, like the article says, he has been invisible, and he certainly wasn't hired to be invisible. He was supposed to be a great baseball mind, who would bring energy back to the team - a mix of Joe Torre and Billy Martin, Hank Steinbrenner said. When he was in the broadcast booth he certainly sounded like he knew his stuff, but maybe Klapisch's source is right, and he's "running scared." If true, that needs to change very, very soon.

If you had to grade Girardi's performance so far, what would you give him?

11 Comments:

Anonymous said...

"the only major impact he's made, from what I can see, is removing candy bars from the locker room"
hahahahaha....that's pretty good greg....i like it...

James Miller said...

0-23 when trailing after the 7th, wow. It doesn't get any more un-yankee-like, than that.

Brady said...

With all the injuries can you really give him more than an incomplete? I was hoping we would see a little more fire from the players... it seems like nothing has changed, really.

Greg Cohen said...

That's fair Brady. He can't control injuries, but you're right nothing really has changed, besides the respect that the players had for Torre, I can't imagine they respect Girardi in the same way.

Brady said...

Quite a few of the guys played WITH him, I can't imagine it is easy for those players to listen to everything he has to say. That being said, I think after a while you have to hear something else, see someone else, and I still believe getting rid of Torre, while hard, was the right thing to do.

Greg Cohen said...

It may or may not have been, I'm not sure yet. At the time I didn't want him to go, but I did like Girardi as the replacement over Pena, Bowa, and Mattingly. We will need to sit back and wait a while until we really know whether it was the right move or not.

Anonymous said...

Grade Girardi? If he was doing an adequate job and the team had this record, maybe a C+ or B-. But his crazy lineup shuffling and managing (and lack thereof) have been a big part in all this.

D- and a couple more losses away from an F.

BigGuy said...

C at most. I was a big Girardi backer but I've been shaking my head at some of the moves and lineups this year. The injuries have been a key and he can't get blamed for that. But they still should be playing better than they are. So far I'm not impressed at all and I really regret having to say that.

Anonymous said...

Interesting.......I am a clocks manufacturer supplier and looking for partners globally. If any one interest please contact me through this website.

Mike said...

D+

All the heat shouldn't be on Girardi either.

Eiland and Long have to get some flak for the poor pitching and hitting too.

Greg Cohen said...

I agree Mike, Long and Eiland haven't been doing a great job either. One thing I will say in defense of Eiland is he's helped some guys behind the scenes, like Edwar Ramirez for example.